One so frequently thinks of Carole Lombard as the madcap that we
forget the many dramatic parts she does. THIS is one of them. This week,
we are looking at her 1931 film Man of the World. Here she
plays heiress Mary Kendall, who is close to marrying Frank Thompson
(Lawrence Gray), but falls in love with con-man and blackmailer Michael
Trevor (William Powell). Just when it seems that Trevor is about to
give up his wicked ways for Mary, he realizes that their life together
is doomed and openly blackmails her uncle, in order to drive Mary away.
We
were surprised at the bleakness of this film. Unhappiness is rampant here. No one ends this film on a happy note (except maybe
Frank). And given that this is precode, we expected a warmer ending.
But, it seems everyone gets punished for Michael trying to mend his
ways.
Lombard is, as always, lovely. She is also touching. Her
Mary is warm and fragile, deeply in love with Michael, willing to
forgive his past, and devastated by his betrayal. And Powell is also
wonderful here. His Michael truly loves; he even has feelings for his
partner-in-crime, Irene (Wynne Gibson). She loves him and finally
convinces him that his relationship with Mary is impossible, leading the
the unhappy ending.
This film was released
before Lombard and Powell married, and it was here that they met. While the marriage didn't last all that long, the friendship between the two did. They are quite sweet together in the film; their affection for one another is evident. It also was nice to see them in something
other than My Man Godfrey (oh, and we all LOVE My Man Godfrey). We enjoyed having the opportunity to see something that was serious.
Next week, we do another serious Lombard movie - In Name Only.
We've decided to begin a mini-Carole Lombard festival for movie
night (mini in the sense that we've done a bunch of her movies in the
past, and won't repeat most of them) We started with We're Not Dressing. This
is a very silly movie. Carole plays an heiress, pursued by two men
(one of who is a very young and callow Ray Milland!!), but she instead
falls in unwilling love with a hand aboard her yacht. His claim to
fame? He can sing to her pet gorilla. He, of course, is Bing Crosby, so
we get treated to a number of songs by the maestro of 1930s pop.
We wondered if Lina Wertmuller (Swept Away)
had seen this movie, because it is the same plot, only done for humor.
And we have additional humor in the form of the delicious Gracie
Allen. We talked a lot about Gracie. As always, she is so funny -
living in her own world, and bemused that others don't get it. This
movie, however, shows the earlier incarnation of George Burns, as an
exasperated and annoyed onlooker to Gracie's viewpoint. We much prefer
him in the 50s, when his response to her nonsense was always "I love
her, that's why".
We were also amused by the "special effects",
obvious cuts between a real gorilla and a man in a costume. Really,
they did do a decent job in the transition. (Why we needed the dumb
gorilla, we never quite figured out. It really was silly beyond
belief).
Is this a great movie? NO. Is it funny - yes, it is.
Thanks to Gracie Allen, and some lovely work by the ever luminous Ms.
Lombard, it is funny. Certainly worth a look (and if you like to listen
to Bing Crosby singing, again - worth your time.) And here is Crosby singing to Lombard in the trailer:
Again, we had a bit of a break in our meetings, but we are back together, and decided to follow up The Searchers with another (and very different John Wayne movie. This time, we saw Without Reservations,
a light comedy feature Claudette Colbert as hit writer Christopher
"Kit" Madden (think of her as Margaret Mitchell crossed with Ayn Rand),
whose best-seller is about to be turned into a motion picture. En route
to the west coast, Kit meets two fliers, Rusty Thomas (John Wayne) and
Dink Watson (Don DeFore). A few seconds with Rusty, and Kit is convinced
that he is the embodiment of her lead character, Mark Winston. She
attaches herself to him, in hopes that he will portray her character in
the upcoming movie.
We found it a bit disconcerting to see
Claudette Colbert going so totally gaga over a man as to be downright
silly. She doesn't want to tell Wayne her real name, so she adopts the
pseudonym Kit - short for Kitty - Klotch. Klotch?? She is a writer; one
would think she could write herself a better character. And then she
gets on a train without a ticket (because the boys are going on the less
expensive train. She has first class accommodations on the SuperChief).
Of course, hijinks ensue, and love - eventually - follows. Here's a scene on the train, in which Rusty discusses Kit's book:
On the
plus side was a cameo by Cary Grant (always welcome), and Don DeFore as
Dink was quite fun. We spoke at some length about DeFore, an actor who
we felt was highly underrated, and probably should have had a more
extensive career. But John Wayne making eyes at Dona Drake (as Dolores
Ortega) just made no sense when the lovely Claudette was there. We
kinda wondered why Kit would stand around doing dishes while the men
flirt with Dolores. The car they are in belongs to Kit. If WE were Kit,
we would have left them behind!! (And gone looking for Cary Grant).
Okay,
so not our favorite movie, but we didn't hate it. It's tongue is mostly
in its cheek, and it does seem to know how totally silly it all is.
With the second World War over, this lighthearted look at a couple of
fliers must have been a welcome relief.
We will be back soon. We'll be spending some time with the glorious Carole Lombard.
We haven't met for awhile (vacations and family issues), and
returned to our get-together with the decision to step away from
Pre-code for awhile. One member of our group had never seen The Searchers. So, we ventured into Monument Valley, to the land of Ford and Wayne.
It
is pointless to say this is a brilliant movie. My friend was struck
immediately by the beauty of the scenery. The cinematography here is
unparalleled. The vistas breathtaking. The differences between
the beauty of the country, and the almost dingy homes of the settlers
is, at times, unnerving: low doors compared to endless skies.
We
had to note this is NOT a holiday movie - with Christmas almost here,
it was a leap of faith for my friend to watch this. It is a relentless
film. At times, the pain is overwhelming. After the film, we looked
again at the scene where Ethan bids Martha goodbye, with Ward Bond
carefully not watching their interchange. With minimal dialogue, this
chaste kiss on the forehead becomes palpably heartbreaking. We know that
these two have a past; we know too, they have no future. Here is that scene:
Finally,
there is John Wayne. His Ethan Edwards is a revelation. Every one of
his critics should be forced to watch this brilliant performance.
Certainly, it is his best performance (and that is saying a lot, when
you consider his work in Red River, Stagecoach, The Quiet Man,
and the cavalry trilogy), and I think his most unusual. One doesn't
think of John Wayne being so callous. The character's bigotry is hard to
watch, but put in the context of the rest of the movie, he is, in many
respects, no different than the other settlers. Listen to Laurie
Jorgenson's (Vera Miles) attitude to Debbie's possible return. Even
Marty is tainted - his treatment of Look is unforgivable, in fact it
makes your skin crawl. The only character who is, I think, truly good
here is Olive Carey's Mrs. Jorgenson, who continues to love Debbie, no
matter where her life has turned.
Next week, we'll be heading to a more festive film. Hope to see you then.
This week, we decided to watch Dancing Lady (1933), famous for
Joan Crawford's only turn at dancing with Fred Astaire (it was his first
picture - as himself). In some senses, this movie is wannabe Busby
Berkeley. Watch the sillouhette scene, where we see young ladies
apparently undresssing, and then the reveal to show that they have
changed into a rather revealing costume for a good example of this.
Joan Crawford stars as the titled Dancing Lady - Janie Barlow, a
burlesque dancer who is determined to hit the big time. With the
assistance of high-society's Tod Newton (Franchot Tone), Janie gets a
letter of introduction to Patch Gallagher (Clark Gable), a Broadway
producer. Her dancing skills land her a part in the chorus; her
determination and pluck land her the lead in the musical.
Of
course, we have a love triangle here: Janie, Tod and Patch; though, in
some ways, her love of Patch is as much her love of dancing. Tod is
high society; he attempts to change Janie ("No shoes with bows on
them". "But I like shoes with bows!"), Patch loves her for who she is.
It is interesting that in some senses this triangle mimicked Crawford's
real life. There have long be rumors of liaisons between her and Gable;
she and Tone were married from 1935 to 1939.
Precode naughy bits
run through the movie. The previously mentioned dance number, the
burlesque strip that opens the film (and almost results in Janie's
imprisonment), a scene where Janie undresses for bed, as the flashing
neon lights outside her NYC apartment flash to reveal what her slip
covers. And then, there is Tod's interest in setting Janie up as his
lover (which she rejects). All rather racy by standards a year later.
Finally, there is the dancing in the movie. It is wonderful to see Astaire in his first picture, and of course his dancing is great. But Crawford, who did start out as a dancer is rather an odd dancer. Her style is rather flapper-ish - her arms and legs splay around. She's not really graceful.
We took a look at an earlier dance number that was featured in That's Entertainment, and it is pretty much the same. A trailer gives you an idea of some of the dancing:
Thankfully, Crawford turned to dramatic parts. We'll look at one of those next time.
For this meeting, we looked at Garbo's Queen Christina.
This is a wonderful film in so many ways. Let's begin at the beginning
- before we even see the glorious Garbo. We were so impressed by Cora
Sue Collins as the young Christina. Just her walk told her story. Only
six years old, but already with a mind of her own, and the ability to
rule, she is both amusing and enthralling. I look forward to seeing a
few more of this actress' films (she appears to have "retired" in 1945).
Then,
we get to Garbo. Her relationship with Aage (C. Aubrey Smith), her
body-man, is unique indeed. How many films actually show a man walking
unbidden into a woman's bedroom to awaken her for the day's work?
Immediately, we understand the dichotomy that is Christina. We quickly
discover she has a lover (Ian Keith, as Count Magnus) and perhaps
another one in the person of her lady-in-waiting, Ebba (Elizabeth
Young). The kiss that Christina bestows on her young maid, and her
anger at discovering Ebba with a young man point up that there is much
more to this relationship than merely that of a Queen and her
handmaiden.
Finally, we get to her nights with John Gilbert. How
is it that EVERY item in the room seems to be phallic? Even a bunch of
grapes make one sit up and take notice. We felt that John Gilbert is a
very underrated actor. We were not sure why his career ended so early.
As we all know, his voice was just fine. Perhaps a bit tenor, but
certainly not unpleasant, and the chemistry between him and Garbo is
palpable. His duel with Ian Keith was exciting; his death scene totally
moving. And then, there is Garbo again. Her face a mask of
determination and pain. I defy anyone to not be moved at the sight of
her staring off into her future. Here it is:
This week, we look at Gold Diggers of 1933, another Busby
Berkeley musical. It looks at the Depression through the eyes of
showgirls who are trying to survive as theatricals close under them.
Enter Brad Roberts (Dick Powell), a young man eager to break into show
business as a songwriter. He agrees to finance a show, as long as it
features his music and stars his love, Polly Parker (Ruby Keeler). Brad
is, it seems, quite wealthy, the younger son of a family that has agreed
to his ambitions as long as he changes his name. However, once his
older brother Lawrence (played by William Warren) finds out that young
Brad is planning on marrying a showgirl, mayhem ensues. Carol's friend
Polly (Joan Blondell) is mistaken by Lawrence for Carol, and Polly
decides to play along.
During the musical numbers, Billy Barty is
back, again as a child in the "Pettin' in the Park" number, oogling all
the lovely ladies. The number ends with the famous scene of him handing
a can opener to Dick Powell, so he can cut the "protected" Ruby Keeler
out of her tin armor. But as racy as the number is, perhaps the
interaction among Joan Blondell, William Warren, Aline MacMahon (as
Trixie Lorraine, another showgirl) and Guy Kibbee ("Fanny", the object
of Trixie's golddigging). The girls con expensive hats out of the men -
retribution for their mission to break up Brad and Carol. And let's not
forget the lovely Fay (Ginger Rogers), whose last name is Fortune, and
who, quite frankly, is looking for one.Of course, all comes right in
then end - Brad get Carol, Polly gets Lawrence, and even Trixie get
"Fanny".
We were surprised that, in this lighthearted romp, the
number that ended the musical is "Remember My Forgotten Man". Its somber
tone is in direct contrast to the rest of the movie, and that it ends
the movie is a statement in and of itself. Coming out in the middle of
the Depression, it reminds the audience of the environment to which they
must return. Here is that scene:
And so, next week we pick up with a more serious story. Hope you'll visit with us again.
We decided it was time to go back to some lighter fare, and since Footlight Parade had a brief moment in Wild Boys of the Road,
we opted to start there. It goes without saying that this movie is
worth seeing if only to watch James Cagney dance (and act. Then again,
he could read a telephone book, and I would watch). But this is a fun
movie, with the added attraction of Joan Blondell. A little tap dancing
from Ruby Keeler, a song from Dick Powell - this is a movie not to be
missed.
In some senses, the plot is not important here. It's the
musical numbers you pay closest attention to. Indeed, most of the more
suggestive bits of this movie are in the musical numbers: "Honeymoon
Hotel", with the silhouette of the apparently naked ladies; "Sitting on
a Backyard Fence" (did Andrew Lloyd Weber see this before making Cats?),
and, of course, "Shanghai Lil". Billy Barty's
Mouse/Little Boy is just oh -so naughty!! Here is the "Shanghai Lil" number:
Busby Berkeley has this
way of making his number ever so slightly off-color, yet they are so
spectacular, that you end up going "did I just see that"? But this
suggestion goes with the lush sets of the musical numbers; it
compliments and enhances the over-the-top and unique vision that is
Berkeley. And then there is Cagney: brash, gutsy, sexy, and with a
dancing style that is hard to imitate (the closest I ever saw was
Mikhail Baryshnikov in his wonderful tv special Baryshnikov on Broadway). We so rarely get to see Cagney dance; double pleasure here.
I'll just start out by saying that this movie was a big
disappointment. We were all so pleased to find another early Claudette
Colbert movie, but she has so little to do here that it was just a waste
of her great talents. I Cover the Waterfront follows reporter
Joe Miller (Ben Lyon) as he tries to get the goods on Eli Kirk (Ernest
Torrence), a smuggler who deals in illegal Chinese immigrants. The
beginning is pretty horrific - about to be trapped by the authorities,
Kirk throws his "cargo" overboard (bound with chains to make absolutely
sure he sinks), with a shrug and the comment that "He knew what he was
getting into." The big complication here is that Kirk has a daughter,
Julie (played by Colbert), and our hero Joe falls in love with her. In
the end, Julie must choose between Joe and her father.
The
meeting between Julie and Joe IS rather funny. Joe receives a report of a
nude woman swimming in the ocean. It's Julie, and it seems she does it
all the time. She doesn't like swimsuits (then again, if one thinks of
the suits at THAT time, one can understand why!). Joe camps himself
beside her clothing, so she is unable to get dressed, and of course, he
won't leave until she agrees to meet him again. Here's a later scene, with Julie and Joe:
We can't really recommend this one, though it is nice to see Claudette in just about anything. Better yet, get Torch Singer!
To celebrate Halloween, we decided to watch the 1931 Dracula
with Bela Lugosi in the title role. What can we say about this iconic
film? To get a bit of perspective, we looked at a scene (the "I never
drink...wine" scene) from the 1931 Spanish-language version which was
shot on the same set as Lugosi's film. Carlos Villar (also known as
Carlos Villarias), who plays the infamous Conte Dracula, probably ends
up being unfairly compared to Lugosi. Sure, he's good, but Lugosi's
Dracula is charismatic. It is why, when we think of Dracula today, we
still tend to think of Lugosi. He's overstated at times, but he is
arresting. It is hard to take your eyes off of him. And of course, they
could not make this sensual a Dracula for years. Perhaps the Frank
Langella version 1979 is an attempt to recapture the sexual nature of
the Count on film.
We also talked a lot about the way in which certain films (this one and Frankenstein, in particular. Both, by the way, from the Precode era. Frankenstein was released only a few months before Dracula) completely overpower their original work. Frankenstein the movie, has so entirely kidnapped the book, that when we say "Frankenstein", who do we automatically think of? - the creature, of course. And it is the wonderful Boris Karloff that we remember. We forget that "Frankenstein" is the DOCTOR, not his creation. And I think, even with all the Frankensteins that have come after, we forget that there ever was a Creature other than Mr. Karloff. A tribute to his portrayal, and the wonderful makeup created by Jack Pierce.
Dracula, the book certainly is very sexual And it is wonderful that this mood
was able to be captured on film. Though, the film goes away from the
book frequently (we lose Lucy the vampire, and Jonathan Harker does not
go to Transylvania), we were rather taken from one major change -
Renfield as the lawyer who ends up as Dracula's first victim. It makes
rather a nice touch to have this explanation for Renfield's madness (and
an explanation as well for his rebellion against Dracula when Mina
Seward is threatened).
This montage of clips from the film might be of interest: