One so frequently thinks of Carole Lombard as the madcap that we
forget the many dramatic parts she does. THIS is one of them. This week,
we are looking at her 1931 film Man of the World. Here she
plays heiress Mary Kendall, who is close to marrying Frank Thompson
(Lawrence Gray), but falls in love with con-man and blackmailer Michael
Trevor (William Powell). Just when it seems that Trevor is about to
give up his wicked ways for Mary, he realizes that their life together
is doomed and openly blackmails her uncle, in order to drive Mary away.
We
were surprised at the bleakness of this film. Unhappiness is rampant here. No one ends this film on a happy note (except maybe
Frank). And given that this is precode, we expected a warmer ending.
But, it seems everyone gets punished for Michael trying to mend his
ways.
Lombard is, as always, lovely. She is also touching. Her
Mary is warm and fragile, deeply in love with Michael, willing to
forgive his past, and devastated by his betrayal. And Powell is also
wonderful here. His Michael truly loves; he even has feelings for his
partner-in-crime, Irene (Wynne Gibson). She loves him and finally
convinces him that his relationship with Mary is impossible, leading the
the unhappy ending.
This film was released
before Lombard and Powell married, and it was here that they met. While the marriage didn't last all that long, the friendship between the two did. They are quite sweet together in the film; their affection for one another is evident. It also was nice to see them in something
other than My Man Godfrey (oh, and we all LOVE My Man Godfrey). We enjoyed having the opportunity to see something that was serious.
Next week, we do another serious Lombard movie - In Name Only.
We've decided to begin a mini-Carole Lombard festival for movie
night (mini in the sense that we've done a bunch of her movies in the
past, and won't repeat most of them) We started with We're Not Dressing. This
is a very silly movie. Carole plays an heiress, pursued by two men
(one of who is a very young and callow Ray Milland!!), but she instead
falls in unwilling love with a hand aboard her yacht. His claim to
fame? He can sing to her pet gorilla. He, of course, is Bing Crosby, so
we get treated to a number of songs by the maestro of 1930s pop.
We wondered if Lina Wertmuller (Swept Away)
had seen this movie, because it is the same plot, only done for humor.
And we have additional humor in the form of the delicious Gracie
Allen. We talked a lot about Gracie. As always, she is so funny -
living in her own world, and bemused that others don't get it. This
movie, however, shows the earlier incarnation of George Burns, as an
exasperated and annoyed onlooker to Gracie's viewpoint. We much prefer
him in the 50s, when his response to her nonsense was always "I love
her, that's why".
We were also amused by the "special effects",
obvious cuts between a real gorilla and a man in a costume. Really,
they did do a decent job in the transition. (Why we needed the dumb
gorilla, we never quite figured out. It really was silly beyond
belief).
Is this a great movie? NO. Is it funny - yes, it is.
Thanks to Gracie Allen, and some lovely work by the ever luminous Ms.
Lombard, it is funny. Certainly worth a look (and if you like to listen
to Bing Crosby singing, again - worth your time.) And here is Crosby singing to Lombard in the trailer:
Again, we had a bit of a break in our meetings, but we are back together, and decided to follow up The Searchers with another (and very different John Wayne movie. This time, we saw Without Reservations,
a light comedy feature Claudette Colbert as hit writer Christopher
"Kit" Madden (think of her as Margaret Mitchell crossed with Ayn Rand),
whose best-seller is about to be turned into a motion picture. En route
to the west coast, Kit meets two fliers, Rusty Thomas (John Wayne) and
Dink Watson (Don DeFore). A few seconds with Rusty, and Kit is convinced
that he is the embodiment of her lead character, Mark Winston. She
attaches herself to him, in hopes that he will portray her character in
the upcoming movie.
We found it a bit disconcerting to see
Claudette Colbert going so totally gaga over a man as to be downright
silly. She doesn't want to tell Wayne her real name, so she adopts the
pseudonym Kit - short for Kitty - Klotch. Klotch?? She is a writer; one
would think she could write herself a better character. And then she
gets on a train without a ticket (because the boys are going on the less
expensive train. She has first class accommodations on the SuperChief).
Of course, hijinks ensue, and love - eventually - follows. Here's a scene on the train, in which Rusty discusses Kit's book:
On the
plus side was a cameo by Cary Grant (always welcome), and Don DeFore as
Dink was quite fun. We spoke at some length about DeFore, an actor who
we felt was highly underrated, and probably should have had a more
extensive career. But John Wayne making eyes at Dona Drake (as Dolores
Ortega) just made no sense when the lovely Claudette was there. We
kinda wondered why Kit would stand around doing dishes while the men
flirt with Dolores. The car they are in belongs to Kit. If WE were Kit,
we would have left them behind!! (And gone looking for Cary Grant).
Okay,
so not our favorite movie, but we didn't hate it. It's tongue is mostly
in its cheek, and it does seem to know how totally silly it all is.
With the second World War over, this lighthearted look at a couple of
fliers must have been a welcome relief.
We will be back soon. We'll be spending some time with the glorious Carole Lombard.
We haven't met for awhile (vacations and family issues), and
returned to our get-together with the decision to step away from
Pre-code for awhile. One member of our group had never seen The Searchers. So, we ventured into Monument Valley, to the land of Ford and Wayne.
It
is pointless to say this is a brilliant movie. My friend was struck
immediately by the beauty of the scenery. The cinematography here is
unparalleled. The vistas breathtaking. The differences between
the beauty of the country, and the almost dingy homes of the settlers
is, at times, unnerving: low doors compared to endless skies.
We
had to note this is NOT a holiday movie - with Christmas almost here,
it was a leap of faith for my friend to watch this. It is a relentless
film. At times, the pain is overwhelming. After the film, we looked
again at the scene where Ethan bids Martha goodbye, with Ward Bond
carefully not watching their interchange. With minimal dialogue, this
chaste kiss on the forehead becomes palpably heartbreaking. We know that
these two have a past; we know too, they have no future. Here is that scene:
Finally,
there is John Wayne. His Ethan Edwards is a revelation. Every one of
his critics should be forced to watch this brilliant performance.
Certainly, it is his best performance (and that is saying a lot, when
you consider his work in Red River, Stagecoach, The Quiet Man,
and the cavalry trilogy), and I think his most unusual. One doesn't
think of John Wayne being so callous. The character's bigotry is hard to
watch, but put in the context of the rest of the movie, he is, in many
respects, no different than the other settlers. Listen to Laurie
Jorgenson's (Vera Miles) attitude to Debbie's possible return. Even
Marty is tainted - his treatment of Look is unforgivable, in fact it
makes your skin crawl. The only character who is, I think, truly good
here is Olive Carey's Mrs. Jorgenson, who continues to love Debbie, no
matter where her life has turned.
Next week, we'll be heading to a more festive film. Hope to see you then.
This week, we decided to watch Dancing Lady (1933), famous for
Joan Crawford's only turn at dancing with Fred Astaire (it was his first
picture - as himself). In some senses, this movie is wannabe Busby
Berkeley. Watch the sillouhette scene, where we see young ladies
apparently undresssing, and then the reveal to show that they have
changed into a rather revealing costume for a good example of this.
Joan Crawford stars as the titled Dancing Lady - Janie Barlow, a
burlesque dancer who is determined to hit the big time. With the
assistance of high-society's Tod Newton (Franchot Tone), Janie gets a
letter of introduction to Patch Gallagher (Clark Gable), a Broadway
producer. Her dancing skills land her a part in the chorus; her
determination and pluck land her the lead in the musical.
Of
course, we have a love triangle here: Janie, Tod and Patch; though, in
some ways, her love of Patch is as much her love of dancing. Tod is
high society; he attempts to change Janie ("No shoes with bows on
them". "But I like shoes with bows!"), Patch loves her for who she is.
It is interesting that in some senses this triangle mimicked Crawford's
real life. There have long be rumors of liaisons between her and Gable;
she and Tone were married from 1935 to 1939.
Precode naughy bits
run through the movie. The previously mentioned dance number, the
burlesque strip that opens the film (and almost results in Janie's
imprisonment), a scene where Janie undresses for bed, as the flashing
neon lights outside her NYC apartment flash to reveal what her slip
covers. And then, there is Tod's interest in setting Janie up as his
lover (which she rejects). All rather racy by standards a year later.
Finally, there is the dancing in the movie. It is wonderful to see Astaire in his first picture, and of course his dancing is great. But Crawford, who did start out as a dancer is rather an odd dancer. Her style is rather flapper-ish - her arms and legs splay around. She's not really graceful.
We took a look at an earlier dance number that was featured in That's Entertainment, and it is pretty much the same. A trailer gives you an idea of some of the dancing:
Thankfully, Crawford turned to dramatic parts. We'll look at one of those next time.
For this meeting, we looked at Garbo's Queen Christina.
This is a wonderful film in so many ways. Let's begin at the beginning
- before we even see the glorious Garbo. We were so impressed by Cora
Sue Collins as the young Christina. Just her walk told her story. Only
six years old, but already with a mind of her own, and the ability to
rule, she is both amusing and enthralling. I look forward to seeing a
few more of this actress' films (she appears to have "retired" in 1945).
Then,
we get to Garbo. Her relationship with Aage (C. Aubrey Smith), her
body-man, is unique indeed. How many films actually show a man walking
unbidden into a woman's bedroom to awaken her for the day's work?
Immediately, we understand the dichotomy that is Christina. We quickly
discover she has a lover (Ian Keith, as Count Magnus) and perhaps
another one in the person of her lady-in-waiting, Ebba (Elizabeth
Young). The kiss that Christina bestows on her young maid, and her
anger at discovering Ebba with a young man point up that there is much
more to this relationship than merely that of a Queen and her
handmaiden.
Finally, we get to her nights with John Gilbert. How
is it that EVERY item in the room seems to be phallic? Even a bunch of
grapes make one sit up and take notice. We felt that John Gilbert is a
very underrated actor. We were not sure why his career ended so early.
As we all know, his voice was just fine. Perhaps a bit tenor, but
certainly not unpleasant, and the chemistry between him and Garbo is
palpable. His duel with Ian Keith was exciting; his death scene totally
moving. And then, there is Garbo again. Her face a mask of
determination and pain. I defy anyone to not be moved at the sight of
her staring off into her future. Here it is:
This week, we look at Gold Diggers of 1933, another Busby
Berkeley musical. It looks at the Depression through the eyes of
showgirls who are trying to survive as theatricals close under them.
Enter Brad Roberts (Dick Powell), a young man eager to break into show
business as a songwriter. He agrees to finance a show, as long as it
features his music and stars his love, Polly Parker (Ruby Keeler). Brad
is, it seems, quite wealthy, the younger son of a family that has agreed
to his ambitions as long as he changes his name. However, once his
older brother Lawrence (played by William Warren) finds out that young
Brad is planning on marrying a showgirl, mayhem ensues. Carol's friend
Polly (Joan Blondell) is mistaken by Lawrence for Carol, and Polly
decides to play along.
During the musical numbers, Billy Barty is
back, again as a child in the "Pettin' in the Park" number, oogling all
the lovely ladies. The number ends with the famous scene of him handing
a can opener to Dick Powell, so he can cut the "protected" Ruby Keeler
out of her tin armor. But as racy as the number is, perhaps the
interaction among Joan Blondell, William Warren, Aline MacMahon (as
Trixie Lorraine, another showgirl) and Guy Kibbee ("Fanny", the object
of Trixie's golddigging). The girls con expensive hats out of the men -
retribution for their mission to break up Brad and Carol. And let's not
forget the lovely Fay (Ginger Rogers), whose last name is Fortune, and
who, quite frankly, is looking for one.Of course, all comes right in
then end - Brad get Carol, Polly gets Lawrence, and even Trixie get
"Fanny".
We were surprised that, in this lighthearted romp, the
number that ended the musical is "Remember My Forgotten Man". Its somber
tone is in direct contrast to the rest of the movie, and that it ends
the movie is a statement in and of itself. Coming out in the middle of
the Depression, it reminds the audience of the environment to which they
must return. Here is that scene:
And so, next week we pick up with a more serious story. Hope you'll visit with us again.
We decided it was time to go back to some lighter fare, and since Footlight Parade had a brief moment in Wild Boys of the Road,
we opted to start there. It goes without saying that this movie is
worth seeing if only to watch James Cagney dance (and act. Then again,
he could read a telephone book, and I would watch). But this is a fun
movie, with the added attraction of Joan Blondell. A little tap dancing
from Ruby Keeler, a song from Dick Powell - this is a movie not to be
missed.
In some senses, the plot is not important here. It's the
musical numbers you pay closest attention to. Indeed, most of the more
suggestive bits of this movie are in the musical numbers: "Honeymoon
Hotel", with the silhouette of the apparently naked ladies; "Sitting on
a Backyard Fence" (did Andrew Lloyd Weber see this before making Cats?),
and, of course, "Shanghai Lil". Billy Barty's
Mouse/Little Boy is just oh -so naughty!! Here is the "Shanghai Lil" number:
Busby Berkeley has this
way of making his number ever so slightly off-color, yet they are so
spectacular, that you end up going "did I just see that"? But this
suggestion goes with the lush sets of the musical numbers; it
compliments and enhances the over-the-top and unique vision that is
Berkeley. And then there is Cagney: brash, gutsy, sexy, and with a
dancing style that is hard to imitate (the closest I ever saw was
Mikhail Baryshnikov in his wonderful tv special Baryshnikov on Broadway). We so rarely get to see Cagney dance; double pleasure here.
I'll just start out by saying that this movie was a big
disappointment. We were all so pleased to find another early Claudette
Colbert movie, but she has so little to do here that it was just a waste
of her great talents. I Cover the Waterfront follows reporter
Joe Miller (Ben Lyon) as he tries to get the goods on Eli Kirk (Ernest
Torrence), a smuggler who deals in illegal Chinese immigrants. The
beginning is pretty horrific - about to be trapped by the authorities,
Kirk throws his "cargo" overboard (bound with chains to make absolutely
sure he sinks), with a shrug and the comment that "He knew what he was
getting into." The big complication here is that Kirk has a daughter,
Julie (played by Colbert), and our hero Joe falls in love with her. In
the end, Julie must choose between Joe and her father.
The
meeting between Julie and Joe IS rather funny. Joe receives a report of a
nude woman swimming in the ocean. It's Julie, and it seems she does it
all the time. She doesn't like swimsuits (then again, if one thinks of
the suits at THAT time, one can understand why!). Joe camps himself
beside her clothing, so she is unable to get dressed, and of course, he
won't leave until she agrees to meet him again. Here's a later scene, with Julie and Joe:
We can't really recommend this one, though it is nice to see Claudette in just about anything. Better yet, get Torch Singer!
To celebrate Halloween, we decided to watch the 1931 Dracula
with Bela Lugosi in the title role. What can we say about this iconic
film? To get a bit of perspective, we looked at a scene (the "I never
drink...wine" scene) from the 1931 Spanish-language version which was
shot on the same set as Lugosi's film. Carlos Villar (also known as
Carlos Villarias), who plays the infamous Conte Dracula, probably ends
up being unfairly compared to Lugosi. Sure, he's good, but Lugosi's
Dracula is charismatic. It is why, when we think of Dracula today, we
still tend to think of Lugosi. He's overstated at times, but he is
arresting. It is hard to take your eyes off of him. And of course, they
could not make this sensual a Dracula for years. Perhaps the Frank
Langella version 1979 is an attempt to recapture the sexual nature of
the Count on film.
We also talked a lot about the way in which certain films (this one and Frankenstein, in particular. Both, by the way, from the Precode era. Frankenstein was released only a few months before Dracula) completely overpower their original work. Frankenstein the movie, has so entirely kidnapped the book, that when we say "Frankenstein", who do we automatically think of? - the creature, of course. And it is the wonderful Boris Karloff that we remember. We forget that "Frankenstein" is the DOCTOR, not his creation. And I think, even with all the Frankensteins that have come after, we forget that there ever was a Creature other than Mr. Karloff. A tribute to his portrayal, and the wonderful makeup created by Jack Pierce.
Dracula, the book certainly is very sexual And it is wonderful that this mood
was able to be captured on film. Though, the film goes away from the
book frequently (we lose Lucy the vampire, and Jonathan Harker does not
go to Transylvania), we were rather taken from one major change -
Renfield as the lawyer who ends up as Dracula's first victim. It makes
rather a nice touch to have this explanation for Renfield's madness (and
an explanation as well for his rebellion against Dracula when Mina
Seward is threatened).
This montage of clips from the film might be of interest:
For those of us only familiar with Gloria Swanson's work in Sunset Boulevard, Indiscreet
is a revelation. No, this is not the Cary Grant / Ingrid Bergman film,
but a 1931 romantic comedy which is a lovely vehicle for Gloria
Swanson's many talents. The story centers around Gerry Trent; we come
in on her life as she breaks up with her cheating boyfriend, Jim
Woodward (Monroe Owsley). We find out quickly that their relationship
is more than casual when Gerry hands Jim his golf clubs from her hall
closet!
Several months later, Gerry meets and falls in love with
Tony Blake (Ben Lyon). After much consideration, she decides to tell
Tony about her prior relationship. He accepts her confession, asks that
she not tell him the name of the man, and tells her that he wants to
marry her. Problems ensue when Gerry's younger sister returns with her
fiance - Jim Woodward. Gerry is horrified, and attempts to break up Jim
and Joan (Barbara Kent). However, her attempts appear to Tony to be an
affair with Jim, and Tony decides to leave for Europe. All is resolved
when Tony releases that he is being an idiot and goes back for Gerry.
They will marry on the ship.
This is a total vehicle for Swanson,
with director Leo McCarey using all her varied talents, comedic and
dramatic. Swanson's pantomime skills, as she tries to convince party
guests that she is loony, are a joy, as is a similar scene when she
tries to sneak aboard the ship on which Tony is leaving the country.
She will have you in stitches. But, she also sings (and isn't bad); and
her Gerry is so sweet and sympathetic that she has you rooting for her
all the way.
This is a delightful movie; a real surprise, and I heartily recommend it. We'll leave you with a clip of Ms. Swanson singing in the film.
Hell's House from 1932 is one of the precode era's
social reform pictures. It is the story of a young man, living with his loving
aunt and uncle after the death of his mother, who is befriended by a
bootlegger. In an effort to make a little extra money, young Jimmy
(played by Junior Durkin) begins working for the bootlegger, is caught, and is sent to an horrific reform school, where
the boys are routinely tortured by the cruel punishments. In an effort
to save his dying friend Shorty, Jimmy escapes and tells his story to a
newspaper. Alas, it is in vain, Shorty dies from his punishment. But
Jimmy is saved when the bootlegger Kelly finally agrees to confess that
he alone was responsible, and that Jimmy had no idea of Kelly's
occupation. It was strange to see Pat O'Brien playing such a
callow fellow. One is not used to seeing him as a villain. And Bette
Davis is in a very minor role as Kelly's girlfriend, a sweet woman (NOT a
moll), who is horrified when she learns of Jimmy's fate, and that her boyfriend was the cause.
This is not a great movie by any means, but
interesting to see the social concerns of the era. Certainly, the boys'
lives in the detention center are no walks in the spring rain, but the
"horrors" are mild by comparison of what we would see today. See it for
an opportunity to view an early Bette Davis film, or Pat O'Brien in a
completely different vein. Here's is a bit of the film's opening:
Wild Boys of the Road! We laughed about the title for
weeks. We were sure it would be quite silly We were WRONG. This is a
fascinating movie. It focuses on three children - two boys and a girl,
about age 15 - who set off on the road because the depression has made
them a burden to their families. The boys, Eddie (Frankie Darrow) and
Tommy (Edwin Phillips) are friends; Tommy's family is already feeling
the poverty of the era, when Eddie's father loses his job. Eddie tries
to help by selling his car, but it is not enough, so the two boys
determine to leave home in order to find work. Of course, they can't.
They meet other children in the same predicament and are chased from
place to place, as their numbers grow and town citizenry become
disenchanted with this gang of impoverished children.
The unique thing about Wild Boys of the Road is that none of the children are mean-spirited or cruel. When Sally (Dorothy Coonan, who would become Wellman's wife) is raped, it is by an adult - her companions rush to her defense. When Eddie loses a leg in an accident, all the children work to support him. Here's that scene:
The beauty of this film is the fact that director Wellman
makes sure that the children are seen in a positive light. Their
existence is almost communal, with all the children staying together, all
contributing to the support of the group. Though they seem to lose
track of their original goal, to support their impoverished families, we
later discover they still hold that goal close to their heart. It is
just that the crushing poverty in which they find themselves make
survival become the priority. The performances, especially Frankie
Darrow, are a joy.
We watched a few minutes of the commentary
(and I look forward to watching the rest of it at a later date); what we
heard was fascinating. The ending is a positive one, but we learned
that Welllman had wanted a far more downbeat ending. We agreed with the
commentator who said that we preferred the positive ending. Had the
film ended differently, I think it would have been unbearable. [And -
an aside - look at the picture on the desk of NYC judge. He will become
famous as a TV actor in later life. The answer is in the commentary].
Don't let the title turn you off. Do watch this. We think you will agree with us, that Wild Boys of the Road is a forgotten gem.
Heroes for Sale is nearly unrelenting in the intensity
of pain that the character of Tom Holmes (Richard Barthelmess) goes
through. A soldier in the first World War, who is severelywounded in an
enemy action, he ends up addicted to morphine when his German doctor can
only relieve his pain rather than remove the shrapnel in his body. He
returns to America to find that his fellow soldier George (Grant
Mitchell) has been given awards for bravery for leading the action in
which Tom was injured, while George hid in a foxhole, paralyzed with
fear. George attempts to help his friend, as much out of fear of being
revealed as anything else, until Tom's addiction becomes known, at which
point Tom is fired from his bank job and put into a rehabilitation
center.
Cured of his drug problem, Tom starts over, marries
(Loretta Young as Ruth), becomes successful, only to have everything
taken away from him yet again. He loses his job, his wife, his son and
finally ends up one of the depression homeless, primarily because he
refuses to live upon the pain of his fellow man.
William Wellman
never lets up in this story. Just when you think Tom will make it,
something else happens to him. Richard Barthelmess is wonderful as Tom.
We felt for him at every moment. He had had a remarkable career in
silents, which continued into the 1930's, finally petering out
(unfortunately) in the 1940's. We had previously seen him in Only Angels Have Wings, and looked forward to seeing him in a lead role; he was not a disappointment.
Unlike the previously discussed Midnight Mary, Loretta Young plays an innocent girl in Heroes for Sale, someone who loves her husband and son
with her whole heart. Young is quite good in what is really a small part.
Besides Barthelmess, though, the other actor of real interest is Aline MacMahon as Mary Dennis. Of particular note is a
scene during which she realizes that Tom has feelings for Ruth. Watch her face -
Aline MacMahon will break your heart.
Ms. MacMahon began her career in 1931, and continued working until 1975. She had started on Broadway, appearing in The Madras House in 1921 - she would continue to work on the New York stage until 1975. She spent her film career in supporting roles, like Trixie Lorraine in Gold Diggers of 1933 and Mrs. Murray in The Search. Married once (from 1928 until her husband's death in 1975), she retired in after completing For the Use of the Hall. She died in 1991, aged 92.
Here's a scene with the always wonderful Aline MacMahon and Richard Barthelmess:
Next week, we conclude this particular precode set with Wild Boys of the Road.
The discussion for today will focus on Midnight Mary. We
were all fascinated to see Loretta Young play a prostitute/gun moll. One
is NOT used to her playing anything but the sweet innocent. However,
she was excellent in this, a tribute to her abilities as an actress.
Though Midnight Mary IS a traditional woman's picture, it is
also a condemnation of the Great Depression, and the conditions that
women faced as a result. Mary Martin ends up in reform school, primarily
because she is an orphan and has no one to defend her (when it is her
friend who is stealing). When she returns to the community, she is
unable to find work, and ultimately turns to prostitution just to pay
for food. We noticed that there are real similarities to the situation
facing Myra in Waterloo Bridge (we were discussing the the 1931
version - because it fit our "precode" focus, but this certainly
applies to the the 1940 version as well).
Quite a bit of our
discussion was about Ricardo Cortez, this time playing Leo, the mobster
(who is a really awful human being). He is, of course, so very different
in this than his role in Torch Singer. We found an
interesting comparison to Franchot Tone's Tom, who is our hero in the
film. Though he marries another woman after Mary rejects him, we felt
that Tone made the character a lot stronger than we would have
expected. We also liked Mary's relationship with him. Her desire to
protect him from her past was lovely; we also felt that he was well
aware of her past, and that it made no difference to him.
Here's a scene, featuring Loretta Young and Ricardo Cortez:
Next posting will be about another very interesting William Wellman film: Heroes for Sale.
San Francisco was not the first movie to show the
devastating effects of the San Francisco earthquake. In fact, Ruth
Chatterton's Jenny in this week's Frisco Jenny also made it out
of the wreckage. However, unlike the latter movie, the earthquake
begins this movie, setting up a chain of events that drive our heroine
to unwed motherhood and prostitution. Of all the movies we've seen so
far, this one had the most traditional "code" feeling. Jenny may become
wealthy as a madam, but she had no happiness, and justice is served in
the end (I won't reveal the ending).
Our discussion focused on comparison to a few other movies we had seen in the past. First, we considered Female,
also starring Ruth Chatterton. While that tooresults in a rather
traditional ending, the character does not get her "just desserts" (if
you will), and she is going to live happily, in spite of her rather
unfettered lifestyle. We also ended up looking at the earthquake scene
again, and then comparing it to the earthquake scene in San Francisco.
We were fascinated that, in the latter, the earthquake is shown almost
entirely in close up. A broken wagon wheel here, some falling bricks
there, a face looking up - all seen almost exclusively from Blackie
Norton (Clark Gable's) perspective, making for a very personal, very
emotional set of scenes. Frisco Jenny avoids close-ups, and
Jenny is almost entirely removed from the action once she sees her
father killed by falling debris. Thus, the earthquake here IS the
actor. Wellman combines stock footage with studio shots to show the
destruction of the City from quake and fire. It works beautifully, but
is less a city of people than the latter film will be. When we return to
Jenny, it is at least seven months later, and Jenny has concerns other
than rebuilding the City. (Too bad she didn't run into Jeannette
MacDonald in her distress. Imagine how much happier her life would have
been!!)
Here is a trailer:
Next week, we venture on to precode Loretta Young! Join us then.
Perhaps we should call The Purchase Price Torch Singer II,
since Barbara Stanwyck also plays a torch singer of spotty reputation
and also does her own singing (though to far less beneficial effect than
Ms. Colbert in Torch Singer. One understands why Ms. Stanwyck was
later dubbed in Ball of Fire! We have a trailer below, with her singing included.) Stanwyck's Joan Gordon wants to
marry; however her lover Eddie Fields (Lyle Talbot) quickly informs us
and reminds her that he is already married. She has a possibility - a
young man of wealth named Don Leslie (Hardie Albright), who dumps her
because his father has discovered her relationship with Fields. She
leaves town - mainly to get away from Eddie. Then, she changes places
with a hotel maid to travel to North Dakota as the mail order pride of
Jim Gibson, played by George Brent.
We've liked George Brent in
pretty much everything we've seen him in, but not this one. His Jim is a
creep. His near-rape attempt of his stranger bride on their first night
together we found revolting, and his assumption that molesting her
immediately was his right as a "husband" doubled our dislike of Jim. I
can't speak for my fellow movie watchers here, but I know I found Eddie a
lot more attractive (and wife or no wife, I would have gone off with
him. He's a much nicer man, and cared more about Joan's well-being than
Jim ever does).
The other creep in the movie was Bull McDowell
(played by David Landau), who offers to advance Jim money IF Joan will
act with a house maid (with benefits, of course). We also found the
rather odd man who stands around barking rather disturbing (we couldn't
figure out WHY he was barking!)
Stanwyck, who is good in
everything, is wonderful in this, and the movie is worth seeing just for
her. There is no question about Joan's character. We see her return a
house key to Eddie, as she goes off to marry. But she attempts to be a
good wife (in all but the physical sense) to Jim, as she tries to win
him over. She is good to her neighbors, and smart and strong. We loved
the scene where she goes off to assist a woman newly delivered of an
infant; alone, and still too weak to care for her newborn and young
daughter, Joan steps in, cooks, cleans and gets the family back on an
even keel. At that point, I dare anyone to NOT be in love with Joan.
As promised, here is a trailer with Stanwyck singing:
After Bill (Grant Withers) succeeds in ducking his marriage to Marie (Joan Blondell), his pal Jack (Regis Toomey) offers to put him up. Jack's wife, Lily (Mary Astor) has no objections, but as time goes on, Bill and Lily start to have feelings for one another.
Other Men's Women is rather an odd movie. The
consensus of our group was that it didn't quite know what it wanted to
be: a romance for the women, or an action-adventure movie for the men.
It did have both elements, with the love story between Grant Withers and
Mary Astor playing out within the context of railroad men. Mary
Astor's character, Lily, disappears for most of the end of the movie,
and one wonders why she would leave her now-blind husband even with the danger of a ensuing flood.
We did enjoy
this early James Cagney appearance. His characterization of Eddie was a
delight - from his first appearance atop a railroad car to the scene
where he meets his girl friend at a fancy club in work clothes - then
proceeds to strip down to the tux he had donned underneath. Add to that
a little dance step of joy, and you can't help but smile at the man who
will launch to "overnight" success as Tom Powers in only two months. He
was an amazing dancer; it's a shame he didn't get to do more of it, but
it does make what we have even more to be appreciated.
The
juxtaposition of the beginning and ending scenes, both set in the same
cafe, really gave you a good look at the development of Grant Wither's
Bill White. A nice advantage of seeing these on DVD is the ability to
go back and compare the two scenes.
Here's a brief scene with Mary Astor and Grant Withers:
Search for Beauty is the final entry in the Pre-Code
Hollywood DVD set, and what a hoot. Buster Crabbe (of Flash Gordon and
Buck Rogers fame) plays an Olympic swimmer who becomes an editor for a
health magazine, only to discover the owners are interested in a
sex magazine. One interesting point is that the movie opens at the 1932
Los Angeles Olympics, showing Crabbe's character, Don Jackson, winning
the gold medal in the 400 meter swim meet - the event for which Crabbe
actually won his gold medal. His best girl is played by Ida Lupino
(appearing as a platinum blonde!). Both are hired by the magazine to
give it credibility, while the publishers fill the rag with salacious
pictures and stories.
There is lots of innuendo here; there are
also male and female swimmers in showers; beauties in bathing suits and
tight training outfits; ladies dancing on table tops in lingerie. In this musical number, you can get a glimpse of some of the milder aspects of the movie:
But parts of the movie are even a bit racier: there
are also naked male bottoms. Early in the film, we venture into the
locker room at the Olympics, to witness several young men running to
showers bare bottomed.
We found the combination of Buster Crabbe, as our
upright hero, and Robert Armstrong, as our loose-moraled publisher (his
character, Larry Williams, just got out of jail as a result of selling
non-existent oil wells) amusing. And, of course, it is never hard to
have James Gleason in a movie, even when his character is not quite on
the right side of the moral.
Finally, do watch to see the scene in
which Ida Lupino listens to two female writers relating the sensational
stories they have written for the magazine. These two look like they
should be teaching Latin, not writing salacious stories!
This week, we watched Murder at the Vanities (or, as the title card had it Earl Carroll's Murder at the Vanities).
The jacket of the dvd said it broke every rule of the code. We agree.
We had young ladies in costumes that barely covered anything (and what
WAS covered was so sheer as to appear transparent)
Vanities star
Eric Lander (played by Danish actor Carl Brisson) announces his
intention to marry his costar Ann Ware (Kitty Carlisle), much to the
annoyance of wannabe lover Rita Ross (Gertrude Michael). We soon learn
that Rita is a vindictive sneak; she has stolen papers and photos from
Eric's flat that implicate his mother in a murder. Soon afterwards, the
private detective (Gail Patrick, finally getting to play a non-bitch)
Eric has hired to recover the stolen papers is found murdered.
We
were taken by the suggestiveness of the whole piece. The previously
mentioned almost-nudity; the fact that we are being asked to sympathize
with a murderer (I won't say more than that. You will have to watch the
movie); the producer (Jack Oakie) who is obviously sleeping with one of
the cast members; the police detective (Victor McLaglan) who so clearly
is setting up a night TO sleep with another young lady. And then there
is the number in which black and white dancers all dance and sing
together to the music of the Duke Ellington orchestra. When we consider
that Shirley Temple got flack for holding Bill Robinson's hand a few
years later, we were stunned. Oh, and then there is the musical number about marijuana:
Was this a great movie? Nope, but it was funny - and worth seeing. You'll be surprised!
Last evening's precode movie was Torch Singer (1933), with
Claudette Colbert as an unwed mother who is forced to surrender her baby
for adoption when she unable to find a means of support for the little
girl. Sally (or Mimi, her career name) becomes a "loose" woman by
reputation. However, IS she? We see her flirting, but never see any
evidence that her reputation is more than rumor to support her
employer's contention that torch singers must suffer for their art.
Suffer she does though, unable to find her little girl, she turns to
drink. We (the viewers in NYC) had a lot of affection for her, and felt
that her reputation was hype.
We were fascinated to learn that
Ms. Colbert did her own singing. She has two songs, a children's
lullaby and her character's signature song "Give Me Liberty or Give Me
Love". Ms. Colbert has an interesting (though not exceptional) voice -
it dark and rather throaty, but she certainly can carry a tune, and she
SURELY sounds like a torch singer.
The two men in her life, played
by Ricardo Cortez (as Tony) and David Manners (as Michael, the father
of the her baby) are surprisingly sympathetic. Both good, supportive men,
who care for her and want the best for her. We are inclined to dislike
Michael at first, but when he tells his side of the story, he becomes
easier to like. It was interesting, we felt, that the men WERE shown in
such a positive light. We expected one or the other to be the villain of
the piece. If there was a villain, it was the women (Michael's aunt)
who refuses to help the destitute Sally.
We were especially
pleased to see the interactions between Sally and the nun who runs the
hospital where Sally gives birth. There is no condemnation here - only
support. And Mother Angelica is, as we learn
later in the film, a woman of deep principle.
Again, we highly recommend this movie for those
of you interested in pre-code movies, or in Claudette Colbert. She is
just glorious!
Last week, we saw Cary Grant in a small roll. This week, we watched Hot Saturday, a 1932 film in which
Cary Grant took second billing to star Nancy Carroll. Ms. Carroll plays
Ruth Brock, a small-town bank clerk, who likes to have fun (the weekly
Hot Saturday), but is basically a "good girl". She is being wooed by
several young men, including local man-about-town Romer Sheffield (Cary
Grant). He is open in his unwillingness to ever marry, but finds her
attractive, and tells her so. She, on the other hand, is looking for
marriage, and while she likes Romer, is unwilling to compromise her
principles for a fling. In order to see her again, Romer invites Ruth's
date (Connie - played by Edward Woods, known for his turn as James
Cagney's brother in Public Enemy) to his home for a party.
Connie accepts, but is infuriated by Romer's attentions to Ruth, and
further angered when Ruth rebuffs his forceful attempts at lovemaking.
The next day, he and his new date, Eva (Lillian Bond), insinuate that
Romer and Ruth are lovers - gossip that spreads through the town like
wildfire.
We were very intrigued by the "racy bits" in this movie -
and there were several. Ruth forceably removing the bloomers that her
younger sister (Annie) steals from Ruth's drawer right from sister
Annie's body; Ruth, awakening, stark naked, after being drenched in a
storm (and her undergarments clearly displayed on a line, just in case
we were unsure that she was totally undressed); the fairly frank
discussions between Romer (and we loved his name. It is pronounced
ROAMER) and Ruth about marriage vs. involvement; Connie's physical
attack on Ruth (complete with the "you owe me this" routine).
Small-town American life is displayed as provincial and bigoted -
telephone conversations escalate the rumors concerning Ruth's night with
Romer, til it is clear she is a "loose woman". An precursor to the
1960's Peyton Place?
This is Cary Grant's sixth film, and the first in which he appears with best friend Randolph
Scott; they only have a brief scene together. Of course, even at this early stage of his career, Grant is just wonderful. His Romer is appealing, yet it is understandable why Ruth resists
him. Unlike Connie, he is a gentleman, taking her rejection with calmly.
Nancy Carroll is also appealing as Ruth - she is NOT a tease. She is
quite open with all of her dates about her goals. But the opportunity
for a Hot Saturday is just too much for some of them to reject. Here's a clip which gives you a taste of the pre-code nature of the film:
Tonight's movie was Merrily We Go to Hell. Frederic March seems to almost be in preparation for his future role in A Star is Born,
playing a drunken reporter, who marries wealthy, loving, and innocent
Sylvia Sidney. Our initial reaction was - why on earth would a lovely
woman like Joan (Sylvia Sidney) be attracted to this drunken fool. He
forgets who she is five minutes after meeting her; then shows up hours
late for their first date. At their engagement party, he shows up late,
and so drunk he has passed out in a cab.
It's not clear if the
film considers Jerry an alcoholic or not. He seems quite able to stop
drinking any time he wants to (the usual claim of drunks); there is also
a certain luridness in his drinking. Yes, he is amusing, but not in the
Nick Charles (The Thin Man) way. He humor is vague and silly.
He forgets what he says after he says it. We find out later that he is
drinking to forget a past girlfriend; when he meets her again, he again
begins drinking (having given it up for his now-wife Joan). Finally, his drunkenness and infidelity drive his wife to drink.
As a brief
aside, we have here an early film of Cary Grant, playing a friend of Jerry's
and date of Joan's. I believe he also has a one second bit (we only see
his back) as an actor in a play (it WAS his voice). Interesting to see
Cary Grant not the romantic lead. It won't last for very long.
Here's a scene with March and Sidney:
Without
giving away the ending, there is no joy here; no real redemption. Will
our couple stay together? Will the drinking resume? And what about that
last line. Just who is Joan talking about when she mentions "my baby".
It does give one pause.
Hello! The Movie Night Group started many years ago - Once a week, some friends and I get together and watch
classic films. We try to do "themes". Just recently, we discussed my blogging our discussion, as a record for us, and to share our opinions with all of you. So, after our "Movie Night", I'll
get back to you on our discussion.
Right now, we are revisiting
PreCode films (we've previously done both of the Forbidden Hollywood
sets), and are using the Universal Pre-Code Hollywood Collection for
our viewing. We started with The Cheat, starring Tallulah
Bankhead. Our reaction - WOW! It's rather over-the-top: Bankhead as a
compulsive gambler who gets herself entangled with a sadist.
We were
fascinated with Irving Pichel who plays our villain, Hardy Livingstone.
(Mr. Pichel later went on to be a director. Among his films was Santa Fe
with Randolph Scott). Mr. Pichel's Hardy starts out appearing rather
effete, but turns out to be a sadistic maniac. Mr. Pichel was
wonderful, making the change from ladies' man to sadist seamlessly.
We
were also amazed by a photo that is in the dvd box that is NOT in
the film. It's very sensational - obviously shot to publicize the movie. It's also
not in the movie (and couldn't be. I won't tell you why.)
I hope you get to see this movie. It's interesting, and not a bit boring. And, quite intense. You might be surprised!